中国当代医药Issue(16)：63-64,67,3.
微创内固定技术与切开复位钢板内固定治疗胫骨远端骨折的效果比较
Clinical effect comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous plate os-teosynthesis and open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of distal tibial fracture
曾健聪 1林卓锋 1杨云海 1邓军1
作者信息
- 1. 深圳市宝安区石岩人民医院骨科，深圳 518108
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of distal tibial fracture. Methods 120 cases of patients with distal tibial fracture treated in our hospital from March 2012 to March 2014 were selected as the study objects,all patients were treated by plates internal fixation,then were divided into ORIF group and MIPPO group,which were treat-ed by ORIF and MIPPO respectively,the clinical efficacy was compared between two groups. Results Operation time, fracture recovery time in MIPPO group was shorter than that in the ORIF group,blood loss was less than that in the ORIF group,the difference was significant (P<0.05).The incidence of complication in ORIF group was lower than that in the ORIF group,the difference was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy,operation technique,safety and practicability of MIPPO are better than those of ORIF,which worhty of being studyed and promoted in clinic.关键词
胫骨远端骨折/微创经皮钢板内固定/切开复位钢板内固定Key words
Distal tibial fracture/Minimally invasive external fixation/Open reduction with internal fixation分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
曾健聪,林卓锋,杨云海,邓军..微创内固定技术与切开复位钢板内固定治疗胫骨远端骨折的效果比较[J].中国当代医药,2014,(16):63-64,67,3.
