| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国当代医药|两种不同镇静方法在ICU重症患者中的应用效果比较

两种不同镇静方法在ICU重症患者中的应用效果比较

李盘石

中国当代医药Issue(12):75-77,3.
中国当代医药Issue(12):75-77,3.

两种不同镇静方法在ICU重症患者中的应用效果比较

Application effect comparison of two different sedative methods in critical patients in ICU

李盘石1

作者信息

  • 1. 广东省东莞市人民医院ICU,广东东莞 523000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the effect of two sedative methods including remifentanil with midazolam and propo-folum with midazolam in critical patients in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods 64 critical patients in our hospital from March to December 2014 were randomly divided into treatment group and control group.In the treatment group, remifentanil with midazolam was applied,while in the control group,propofolum with midazolam was adopted.The Ram-say sedation score,Ricker sedation-agitation scoring (SAS) between the two groups was compared;Heart rate (HR),mean arterial pressure (MAP),breathing rate (RR) before treatment and after 0.5 h,6 h and 12 h treatment was observed. Re-sults There was no statistical difference in Ramsay sedation score and Ricker SAS after 0.5 h,6 h,and 12 h treatment (P>0.05).Before treatment,HR,MAP and RR between the two groups had no statistical difference (P>0.05);After treat-ment,HR and RR between the two groups had no statistical difference (P>0.05),but MAP between the two groups had statistical difference (P<0.05). Conclusion Sedative effect of remifentanil with midazolam and propofolum with midazo-lam is almost the same,but influence on patient’s mean arterial pressure is milder by remifentanil with midazolam.

关键词

瑞芬太尼/咪达唑仑/丙泊酚/镇静

Key words

Remifentanil/Midazolam/Propofolum/Sedation

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李盘石..两种不同镇静方法在ICU重症患者中的应用效果比较[J].中国当代医药,2015,(12):75-77,3.

中国当代医药

1674-4721

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文