实用临床医药杂志Issue(14)：78-80,3.DOI:10.7619/jcmp.201514025
锁定加压板与解剖重建板治疗锁骨粉碎性骨折的疗效及远期安全性比较
The comparison between curative efficacy and long-term safety of locking compression plate and anatomical reconstruction in the treatment of clavicle comminuted fracture
钱金黔 1赵新华 1赵志芳 1郑洁1
作者信息
- 1. 解放军第 117 医院，浙江 杭州，310013
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To investigate curative efficacy and long-term safety of locking compression plate and anatomical reconstruction in the treatment of clavicle comminuted fracture. Methods A total of 120 patients with clavicle fractures in our hospital were divided into study group and control group,the control group were treated with anatomical reconstruction plate thera-py while the study group was treated with locking compression plate surgery treatment.The intra-operative blood,fracture healing time,good rate and complication rate of the two groups were ob-served and compared.Results Intraoperative blood and fracture healing time of the two groups were basically consistent,the difference were not statistically significant (P >0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications of the study group was significantly lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05).The good rate of the study group was significant-ly better than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05).Con-clusion The effect of locking compression plate clavicle fractures is more pronounced than the anatomical reconstruction plate,and it has a lower complication rate,more security,so it is reliable for long-term clinical application.关键词
锁定加压板/解剖重建板/锁骨粉碎性骨折/远期安全性Key words
locking compression plate/anatomical reconstruction plate/clavicle fractures/long-term safety分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
钱金黔,赵新华,赵志芳,郑洁..锁定加压板与解剖重建板治疗锁骨粉碎性骨折的疗效及远期安全性比较[J].实用临床医药杂志,2015,(14):78-80,3.
