| 注册
首页|期刊导航|口腔颌面外科杂志|微创法与劈冠法在下颌低位阻生智齿拔除中的比较研究

微创法与劈冠法在下颌低位阻生智齿拔除中的比较研究

赵学军

口腔颌面外科杂志Issue(3):230-232,3.
口腔颌面外科杂志Issue(3):230-232,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2014.03.016

微创法与劈冠法在下颌低位阻生智齿拔除中的比较研究

Minimally Invasive Extraction Method in the Extraction of Low Impact Wisdom Teeth

赵学军1

作者信息

  • 1. 北京市密云县中医医院口腔科,北京 101500
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of minimally invasive extraction method in the process for low impact wisdom teeth extraction. Method:134 cases were retrospectively reviewed. In experiment group (n=69), minimally invasive method were used for teeth extractions. In control group (n=65), hammer chisel splitting method were used for teeth extractions. The duration of tooth extraction, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications between the two groups were compared. Results: Duration of extraction in mini invasive group was (16.28±1.01) min while that of chisel group was (32.25 ±1.09) min (P<0.01). Intraoperative complications such as adjacent tooth mobility, root fracture, lingual bone plate fracture also showed significant difference between two groups (P<0.05), and no difference on gingival avulsion (P>0.05). Postoperative complications such as dry socket, limited mouth opening, postoperative pain demonstrated significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01), the former is obviously lower than the latter. Conclusion:Minimally invasive tooth extraction method demonstrated obvious advantages in the extraction of low impact wisdom teeth.

关键词

下颌低位阻生智齿/牙拔除术/微创拔牙法/锤凿劈冠法

Key words

mandibular impacted wisdom teeth low/extraction/minimally invasive tooth extraction method/hammer chisel split crown method

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

赵学军..微创法与劈冠法在下颌低位阻生智齿拔除中的比较研究[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2014,(3):230-232,3.

口腔颌面外科杂志

OACSTPCD

1005-4979

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文