| 注册
首页|期刊导航|南都学坛|明清实录对武当山记载的差异

明清实录对武当山记载的差异

谢贵安

南都学坛Issue(2):23-27,5.
南都学坛Issue(2):23-27,5.

明清实录对武当山记载的差异

Analysis of the Different Records about Mount Wudang in the Ming and Qing Emperors’ Annals

谢贵安1

作者信息

  • 1. 武汉大学历史学院,湖北武汉430072
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

The historical status of Mount Wudang is not invariant but in the process of change with the time.As the national holy religious place, it is built in large scale during the reign of Emperor Yongle, therefore, it enjoys the highest status in the Ming Dynasty.However, after the establishment of the Qing Dynasty, its status becomes low because Manchu appreciates Tibetan Buddhism and degrades central plain Buddhism and Taoism.As a result, the change of its official status is prominently reflected in the national history of these two dynasties, namely, the Ming Emperors’ Annals and the Qing Emperors’ Annals.Specifically, the former has a full description of Mount Wudang and Taoism, while in the latter the records are rare and vague.As far as the history is concerned, the change of the power and the replacement of officials should not result in the ignorance of the formed traditional culture.In a word, the success of Mount Wudang’ s application for World Cultural Heritage assures the Taoism culture of avoiding the changeable fate because of the political reason.

关键词

《明实录》/《清实录》/武当山/宗教政策/历史书写

Key words

the Ming Emperors’ Annals/the Qing Emperors’ Annals/Monut Wudang/religious policy/history writing

分类

社会科学

引用本文复制引用

谢贵安..明清实录对武当山记载的差异[J].南都学坛,2015,(2):23-27,5.

南都学坛

OACHSSCD

1002-6320

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文