| 注册
首页|期刊导航|农业环境科学学报|濆江流域不同土地利用方式下土壤磷积累特征及流失风险

濆江流域不同土地利用方式下土壤磷积累特征及流失风险

黄永杰 张世熔 蒲玉琳 杨玲 徐小逊 贾永霞

农业环境科学学报Issue(2):337-344,8.
农业环境科学学报Issue(2):337-344,8.DOI:10.11654/jaes.2015.02.018

濆江流域不同土地利用方式下土壤磷积累特征及流失风险

Accumulation and Loss Risk of Soil Phosphorus Under Different Land Uses in Fenjiang River Watershed

黄永杰 1张世熔 1蒲玉琳 2杨玲 1徐小逊 2贾永霞1

作者信息

  • 1. 四川农业大学资源环境学院,成都 611130
  • 2. 四川省土壤环境保护重点实验室,成都 611130
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Phosphorus(P)is one of the greatest demanded nutrients for crop growth, but unreasonable land use and management are major factors causing non—point source P pollution. This paper examined accumulation and sorption characteristics and potential loss risk of sur—face soil P under seven land—use types in the Fenjiang River watershed, using field investigation, laboratory analysis, and mathematical statistics. The seven land—use types include farmland(FL), orchard land(OL), tea plantation land(TP), artificial forest land(AF), natural forest land(NL), forage grass land(FG), and weeds land(WL). The content of soil total P in AF, FG and FL were greater than 1.0 g·kg—1, showing an accumulation trend. In FG and FL, soil Olsen—P content was equal to or higher than 40.0 mg·kg—1, exceeding the critical value of P loss. The content of soil CaCl2—P was higher than 4.5 mg·kg—1 in AF, FG and FL, exceeding the critical value of P loss as well. TP soil had a stronger P sorption and fixation, whereas FL, OL, AF, and FG had a weaker P sorption and fixation, especially AF. The present results show that AL, FL and FG have higher potential risk of P runoff loss and leaching, while OL, WL and NL have a relatively lower risk of P loss. TP soil has almost no P loss risk.

关键词

濆江流域/土地利用方式/土壤磷素/积累特征/流失风险

Key words

Fenjiang River watershed/land use types/soil phosphorus/accumulation/potential loss risk

分类

资源环境

引用本文复制引用

黄永杰,张世熔,蒲玉琳,杨玲,徐小逊,贾永霞..濆江流域不同土地利用方式下土壤磷积累特征及流失风险[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,(2):337-344,8.

基金项目

四川省教育厅项目(14ZB0011);四川省科技支撑计划 ()

农业环境科学学报

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

1672-2043

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文