| 注册
首页|期刊导航|人民黄河|河口村水库工程坝线坝型方案比选

河口村水库工程坝线坝型方案比选

褚青来 姜苏阳 李艳 崔莹

人民黄河Issue(10):100-102,3.
人民黄河Issue(10):100-102,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2014.10.030

河口村水库工程坝线坝型方案比选

Discussion on Dam Type and Dam Line of the Hekoucun Reservoir

褚青来 1姜苏阳 2李艳 2崔莹2

作者信息

  • 1. 河南省河口村水库工程建设管理局,河南 济源 454650
  • 2. 黄河勘测规划设计有限公司,河南 郑州 450003
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

There was no technical element to restrict or negative the existing dam type in three dam sites(lines)through the technical and economic comparison with the second dam site(line)concrete face rockfill dam(with asphalt concrete core wall dam),the third dam site(line)of roller compacted concrete gravity dam type and the fourth dam site(line)concrete face rockfill dam type. The existing geological problems all could be solved through engineering measures. Further research and argumentation results show that building concrete gravity dam and concrete face dam and asphalt concrete core wall dam in technology is feasible and the second dam site(line)concrete face rockfill dam scheme in investment,schedule and construction is more advantages.

关键词

混凝土面板堆石坝/混凝土重力坝/沥青混凝土心墙坝/坝型比较/坝址(线)/河口村水库

Key words

concrete face rockfill dam/concrete gravity dam/asphalt concrete core wall dam/dam type comparison/dam site(line)/Hekoucun Reservior

分类

建筑与水利

引用本文复制引用

褚青来,姜苏阳,李艳,崔莹..河口村水库工程坝线坝型方案比选[J].人民黄河,2014,(10):100-102,3.

人民黄河

OA北大核心

1000-1379

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文