| 注册
首页|期刊导航|四川医学|无保护会阴接生法与会阴侧切接生法临床效果比较

无保护会阴接生法与会阴侧切接生法临床效果比较

李咏冰

四川医学Issue(12):1539-1541,3.
四川医学Issue(12):1539-1541,3.

无保护会阴接生法与会阴侧切接生法临床效果比较

Comparison of the Effects of Unprotected Perineum Delivery Technique and Episiotomy Delivery Technique on the Clinic

李咏冰1

作者信息

  • 1. 自贡市第一人民医院妇产科,四川 自贡 643000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the effect of unprotected perineum delivery technique and episiotomy delivery tech-nique on outcomes of delivery and the perineal wound. Methods A prospective follow-up study of 265 women with spontaneous vaginal delivery in thehospital from January to November 2013. These women were randomized into the unprotected perineum deliv-ery group(184)and the control group(81),that is routine episiotomy delivery technique group. The time of second stage of labor, newborns conditions,the blood loss,perineal pain and woundhealing stage in the two groups were compared. Results No signifi-cant difference among the pariae’s age,newborn weight,the second stage time,the scores of APCAR and the postpartum blood loss was found between groups. Women who delivered with unprotected perineum delivery techniquehad significantly lower perineal pain scores compared to women whohad an episiotomy technique. The perineal woundhealing stage in the unprotected perineum delivery technique group was better than the control group. Conclusion The unprotected perineum delivery technique can lower the level of perineal pain and decrease the degree of the wound swelling,improve the woundhealing stage,meanwhile,not to increase the time of the second stage of labor and neonatal asphyxia. This technique is simple,safe,effective,beneficial to the protection of maternal safety,and to reduce the perineal body injury. It is worthy of clinical application.

关键词

无保护会阴接生法/会阴侧切/会阴裂伤

Key words

unprotected perineum delivery technique/episiotomy/perineal laceration

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李咏冰..无保护会阴接生法与会阴侧切接生法临床效果比较[J].四川医学,2014,(12):1539-1541,3.

四川医学

OACSTPCD

1004-0501

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文