| 注册
首页|期刊导航|天文学进展|GNSS 对流层延迟映射模型分析

GNSS 对流层延迟映射模型分析

王君刚 陈俊平 王解先

天文学进展Issue(3):383-394,12.
天文学进展Issue(3):383-394,12.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8349.2014.03.07

GNSS 对流层延迟映射模型分析

Analysis of Tropospheric Propagation Delay Mapping Function Models in GNSS

王君刚 1陈俊平 2王解先3

作者信息

  • 1. 同济大学 测绘与地理信息学院,上海 200092
  • 2. 中国科学院 上海天文台,上海 200030
  • 3. 中国科学院 上海天文台,上海 200030
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Three models frequently used within the IGS for tropospheric propagation delay estimation including NMF, GMF/GPT, VMF1, and the newly-developed model GPT2 are presented in this paper. These models are compared in two scenarios: pressure, hydrostatic zenith delay and mapping function coefficients from different models were compared directly;coordinates and tropospheric parameters from the Precise Point Position (PPP) solutions based on different models using 1 year data of 30 global distributed IGS stations were compared. Results show: (1) Compared to the measured true pressure, VMF1 is the most accurate modeling more than 99.6% of pressure and the accuracy of GPT2 is improved by 25% over GPT; (2) Compared to the VMF1 HT model estimates, the RMS of hydrostatic zenith delay is 1 cm for both GPT and GPT2, and GPT2 is better than GPT;(3) Compared to the daily site VMF1 data, the RMS of mapping function coefficients ah and aw of GPT2 are 1 × 10-5 and 5 × 10-5, respectively;(4) Considering the coordinates from IGS08 frame as true values, estimated coordinates using GMF/GPT or VMF1/GPT2 have an improvement of 22%than NMF;(5) The PPP ZTD estimates using GMF/GPT and VMF1/GPT2 model are more accurate than NMF.

关键词

对流层延迟/映射函数/精密单点定位/GPS

Key words

tropospheric propagation delay/mapping function/precise point position/GPS

分类

天文与地球科学

引用本文复制引用

王君刚,陈俊平,王解先..GNSS 对流层延迟映射模型分析[J].天文学进展,2014,(3):383-394,12.

基金项目

中国科学院百人计划;863计划(2013AA122402,2014AA123102);国家自然科学基金(40974018,11273046);上海市科学技术委员会(12DZ2273300,13PJ1409900) (2013AA122402,2014AA123102)

天文学进展

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

1000-8349

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文