| 注册
首页|期刊导航|武警医学|老年多器官功能不全综合征预后评估五种评分系统比较

老年多器官功能不全综合征预后评估五种评分系统比较

赵志锐 王慧娟 张鑫 郭超 解立新

武警医学Issue(12):1195-1198,4.
武警医学Issue(12):1195-1198,4.

老年多器官功能不全综合征预后评估五种评分系统比较

Application of five scoring systems to prognostic evaluation in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in the elderly

赵志锐 1王慧娟 2张鑫 1郭超 3解立新1

作者信息

  • 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院呼吸科
  • 2. 100020,北京朝阳医院呼吸科
  • 3. 100037 北京,阜外心血管病医院心血管内科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the prognostic value of five scoring systems in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syn-drome in the elderly( MODSE) .Methods In this study, we collected the clinical data of 465 patients with MODSE.Acute Physiology and Chronic Health EvaluationⅡ( APACHEⅡ) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅲ ( APACHE Ⅲ) score, Simplified Acute Physiology ScoreⅡ( SAPSⅡ) , Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ( SOFA) score and Multiple Organ Dysfunc-tion Syndrome in the Elderly Score( MODSES) were all calculated.The prognostic values of five scoring systems were evaluated by re-ceiver operator characteristic( ROC) curve.Results In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.768( 95%CI, 0.725-0.811) for APACHEⅡ, 0.796(95%CI, 0.755-0.837) for APACHE Ⅲ, 0.789(95%CI, 0.748-0.830) for SAPSⅡ, 0.746(95%CI, 0.701-0.791) for SOFA and 0.783(95%CI, 0.740-0.825) for MODSES, APACHEⅢhad the high-est sensitivity of 0.780, and APACHEⅡhad the highest specificity of 0.835.Conclusions The five scoring systems showed satis-factory forecasting ability in prognostic prediction of patients with MODSE.The scoring systems with high prognostic values are A-PACHEⅢ, SAPSⅡand MODSES.

关键词

老年多器官功能不全综合征/预后评估

Key words

multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in the elderly/effectiveness evaluation

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

赵志锐,王慧娟,张鑫,郭超,解立新..老年多器官功能不全综合征预后评估五种评分系统比较[J].武警医学,2014,(12):1195-1198,4.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金 ()

武警医学

OACSTPCD

1004-3594

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文