| 注册
首页|期刊导航|物探与化探|TGP二维与三维地质预报成果对比

TGP二维与三维地质预报成果对比

林超群 刘成禹 林毅鹏 刘汗青

物探与化探Issue(6):1235-1240,1245,7.
物探与化探Issue(6):1235-1240,1245,7.DOI:10.11720/wtyht.2014.6.26

TGP二维与三维地质预报成果对比

Comparison between TGP 2D and 3D geological prediction results

林超群 1刘成禹 1林毅鹏 1刘汗青1

作者信息

  • 1. 福州大学 环境与资源学院,福建 福州 350108
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Based on advanced theory of TGP ( Tunnel Geological Prediction) and actual engineering data, the authors applied informa⁃tion logic method to analyzing TGP 2D and 3D geological prediction results and mainly compared the similarities and differences in the aspects of the geological structure position, scale, surrounding rock classification and attutude. The results show that, if the surrounding rocks in front of the tunnel have no obvious difference in lithology, 2D and 3D geological prediction results are essentially the same. When the geological structures and tunnel are obliquely crossed, 2D and 3D are similar in the prediction results of tectonic attitude;however, 2D is advantageous in the surrounding rock classification prediction, and 3D is advantageous in the size and location predic⁃tion. Where the geological structure does not intersect with the tunnel side wall which is near the hole line excitation, 2D and 3D geo⁃logical prediction results are substantially different, and 3D geological prediction results are better than 2D prediction results.

关键词

TGP二维地质预报/TGP三维地质预报/超前预报/信息化逻辑方法/隧道/地质构造

Key words

TGP 2D prediction result/TGP 3D prediction result/advanced prediction/information logic method/tunnel/geological structure

分类

天文与地球科学

引用本文复制引用

林超群,刘成禹,林毅鹏,刘汗青..TGP二维与三维地质预报成果对比[J].物探与化探,2014,(6):1235-1240,1245,7.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金项目 ()

物探与化探

OACSCDCSTPCD

1000-8918

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文