| 注册
首页|期刊导航|西北水电|对不同空化模型的比较研究

对不同空化模型的比较研究

薛瑞 张淼 许战军 蔺蕾蕾

西北水电Issue(2):85-89,5.
西北水电Issue(2):85-89,5.

对不同空化模型的比较研究

Comparison and Study on Different Cavitation Models

薛瑞 1张淼 1许战军 1蔺蕾蕾1

作者信息

  • 1. 中国水电顾问集团西北勘测设计研究院,西安 710065
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Currently, model test and value analysis are the main means for the study of the cavitation failure force in the hydraulic struc-tures.In the value analysis, the cavitatio model is mostly applied.Selection of the cavitation model largely impacts calculation of cavitati-on flowing.The cavitation model based on Rayliegh-Plesset equation is widely applied.Among the cavitation models, the representative ones are Schnerr &Sauer, Singhal and Zwart.In the paper, the three models above mentioned are applied to simulate, in steady-state and non-steady-state values, the cavitation flowing phenomenon of the square body.The flow model applies sst k-ωmodel.In combina-tion with UDF (user defines function) method in commercial software, the model viscosity is corrected.The calculation shows that ro-bustness of Zwart, Schnerr and Sauer models are better than that of Singhal model.Furthermore, the obvious air bubble movement can be seen.Distribution of the pressure coefficient of the wall surface from Schnerr and Sauer models is most close to the experimental value.In the non-steady-state calculation, the periodic phase variation process caused by the periodic variation of the quality cavitation source can be obtained by Singhal model.

关键词

空化/Rayliegh-Plesset/sst k-ω/紊流/模型

Key words

cavitation/Rayliegh-Plesset/sst k-ω/turbulent flow/model

分类

建筑与水利

引用本文复制引用

薛瑞,张淼,许战军,蔺蕾蕾..对不同空化模型的比较研究[J].西北水电,2014,(2):85-89,5.

西北水电

1006-2610

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文