| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国组织工程研究|可吸收棒与Herbert螺钉修复桡骨小头骨折:治疗效应及经济学的比较

可吸收棒与Herbert螺钉修复桡骨小头骨折:治疗效应及经济学的比较

王思成 张友忠 杨国庆 何金国 方阳 刘祥飞 吴献民 杨笑宇

中国组织工程研究Issue(26):4153-4157,5.
中国组织工程研究Issue(26):4153-4157,5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.26.010

可吸收棒与Herbert螺钉修复桡骨小头骨折:治疗效应及经济学的比较

Absorbable rod versus Herbert screw for radial head fractures:therapeutic effects and treatment costs

王思成 1张友忠 1杨国庆 1何金国 1方阳 1刘祥飞 1吴献民 1杨笑宇1

作者信息

  • 1. 上海中冶职工医院骨科,上海市 200941
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Mason II type and III type radial head fractures with massive bone are mainly treated by open reduction and metal fixation, but metal implants have to be removed in the second operation, which increased patients’ travail and financial burden. Absorbable screw/rod also can be used to treat radial head fractures, and has its special advantages due to the low price and no second operation. OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical therapeutic effects of absorbable rod and Herbert screw for the treatment of Mason II or III type radial head fractures. METHODS:A total of 80 patients with Mason II and III type radial head fractures were equal y assigned to experimental and control groups. They received open reduction and internal fixation. The experimental group was treated with absorbable rod and the control group received Herbert screw. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:A total of 79 patients were fol owed up for averagely 34 months. No significant difference in average operative time, fracture healing time, Broberg and Morrey elbow scores and incidence of complications was detected between the experimental and control groups (P>0.05). However, treatment costs were lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.05). Results indicated that the therapeutic effects between absorbable rod and Herbert screw for Mason II or III type radial head fractures were similar. However, absorbable rod for radial head fractures can avoid the second operation for removal of the implant. Therefore, we recommend absorbable rod in the choice of internal fixation materials.

关键词

植入物/骨植入物/可吸收棒/Herbert螺钉/桡骨小头骨折/随机对照研究/治疗费用

Key words

fracture fixation, intramedul ary/bone nails/radius fractures/absorbable implants

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

王思成,张友忠,杨国庆,何金国,方阳,刘祥飞,吴献民,杨笑宇..可吸收棒与Herbert螺钉修复桡骨小头骨折:治疗效应及经济学的比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,(26):4153-4157,5.

中国组织工程研究

OA北大核心CSTPCD

2095-4344

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文