| 注册
首页|期刊导航|现代医药卫生|不同气道湿化方法对气管切开术后患者排痰效果比较

不同气道湿化方法对气管切开术后患者排痰效果比较

余华 杨雪莲

现代医药卫生Issue(20):3064-3065,2.
现代医药卫生Issue(20):3064-3065,2.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-5519.2014.20.010

不同气道湿化方法对气管切开术后患者排痰效果比较

Effect comparison on expectoration of two methods of airway humidification after tracheotomy

余华 1杨雪莲1

作者信息

  • 1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科,重庆400016
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To observe the expectoration effect of two methods of airway humidification after tracheotomy. Methods A total of 60 patients in neurosurgical intensive care unit who had tracheotomy but without mechanical ventilation were randomly divided into two groups,30 cases in each group. The control group adopted continuous airway humidification of Braun precision infusion with normal saline,while the observation group used continuous airway humidification of micropump with infusion thermostat and 0.45%sodium chloride. The effects of expectoration of the two groups were compared. Results The spu-tum density,sputum crust、airway mucosa damage and pulmonary infection of patients in the observation group were lower than those in the control group with statistically significant difference(P<0.05). Conclusion Micropump with infusion thermostat and 0.45%sodium chloride can help to improve the effects of airway humidification ,which is better than Braun precision infusion with normal saline.

关键词

气管切开术/护理/插管法,气管内/护理/湿化/微量泵/输液恒温器

Key words

Tracheotomy/nursing/Intubation,intratracheal/nursing/Humidification/Micropump/Infusion thermostat

引用本文复制引用

余华,杨雪莲..不同气道湿化方法对气管切开术后患者排痰效果比较[J].现代医药卫生,2014,(20):3064-3065,2.

基金项目

2010年国家临床重点专科护理建设项目(财社[2010]305)。 ()

现代医药卫生

1009-5519

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文