摘要
Abstract
Objective A retrospective analysis is conducted regarding effect and safety of gynecological laparoscopic surgery in grass-roots hospitals. Methods A total of 993 cases were underwent gynecological surgery from June 2007 to May 2011 in this hospital,including 511 cases with laparoscopic approach and 482 with traditional surgery. The indicators including disease types,surgical indications,surgical procedures,surgical efficacy and surgical safety were retrospectively analyzed and compared. Results Among 511 cases,494 cases were completed successfully in the laparoscopic surgery,accounting for 96.67%,17 cases transferred to laparotomy,accounting for 3.33%,10 cases showed significant complications,accounting for 1.96%. By contrast,among the 482 cases with the traditional surgical approach,12 cases showed significant complications,accounting for 2.49%. The operation time,intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay by laparoscopic approach were superior to those of the traditional operation with statistically significant difference (P<0.05),while the incidence of surgical complications after the operation show no significant difference(P>0.05). Conclusion The laparoscopic surgery is more better than traditional op-eration in effect and advantages,alleviating the suffering of patients and saving hospital resources,which is more feasible and could be promoted in conditional grass-roots hospitals widely.关键词
腹腔镜检查/妇科外科手术/手术后并发症/基层医院Key words
Laparoscopy/Gynecologic surgical procedures/Postoperative complications/Primary hospital
