西南国防医药Issue(10):1100-1102,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-0188.2014.10.021
射频消融术与宫腔镜电切术治疗功能性子宫出血临床疗效对比
Clinical effect comparison between radiofrequency ablation and hysteroscopic electrocision in treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding
高东霞 1王普杰 1汪易辉 1郝冰 1范贵荣1
作者信息
- 1. 621000 四川 绵阳,解放军 520 医院妇产科微创中心
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effects between ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation( RFA)and hysteroscopic electrocision(ES)in treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding(DUB). Methods Total 110 patients diagnosed as DUB from Jan. of 2006 to Jan. 2013 were selected and divided into RFA group(the observation group)and ES group(control group)according to the operation pattern;and then,the operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,hospital day and the effects of treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time of the observation group was 6-15(7. 5 ± 2. 2)min and the control group was 16-45(25. 4 ± 4. 3)min;the intraoperative bleeding volume of the observation group was 0-5(1. 0 ± 0. 5)ml and the control group was 10-50(30. 0 ± 6. 5)ml;the hospital day of the observation group was 0-2(0. 3 ± 0. 1)d and the control group was 3-6(4. 2 ± 1. 1) d. The differences between two groups were significant(P < 0. 01). 46 ones were cured and 9 ones were of curative effects in the observation group;25 ones were cured,15 ones was of curative effects,10 ones became better and 5 ones had not any curative effects in the control group. The curative effect of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Compared with ES,RFA has more advantages for treatment of DUB,such as shorter operation time,less intraoperative bleeding volume and high cure rate. Besides,RFA operation is simple and easy to be mastered.关键词
功能性子宫出血/射频消融术/宫腔镜电切术Key words
dysfunctional uterine bleeding/radiofrequency ablation/hysteroscopic electrocision分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
高东霞,王普杰,汪易辉,郝冰,范贵荣..射频消融术与宫腔镜电切术治疗功能性子宫出血临床疗效对比[J].西南国防医药,2014,(10):1100-1102,3.