中国医疗设备Issue(11)：139-141,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2014.11.048
腔镜器械两种灭菌方法的效果比较
Comparison of the Effects of Two Kinds of Sterilization Methods of Endoscopic Equipment
刘盈 1唐其柱1
作者信息
- 1. 武汉大学人民医院，湖北 武汉 430060
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To investigate the application effects of two kinds of sterilization methods of endoscopic equipment. Methods 384 endoscopic devices used from October 2011 to October 2013 in the hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The sterilization of 192 endoscopic devices in control group was conducted by using immersion sterilization with 2% alkaline glutaraldehyde while the sterilization of 192 endoscopic devices in observation group was conducted by using low-temperature sterilization with hydrogen peroxide gas plasma. Then the qualiifed situation of bacterial culture, the sterilization effectiveness, damage situation of endoscopic devices and adverse reactions of operators of observation group were compared with those of control group.Results The qualiifed rate of bacterial culture of observation group was signiifcantly higher than that of control group (P<0.05). The sterilization time of observation group was signiifcantly shorter than that of control group (P<0.05). The effective time of sterilization of observation group was signiifcantly longer than that of control group (P<0.05). The damage rate of endoscopic devices and adverse reaction incidence rate of operators of observation group were signiifcantly lower than those of control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Both of immersion sterilization with 2% alkaline glutaraldehyde and low-temperature sterilization with hydrogen peroxide gas plasma are effective sterilization methods for endoscopic equipment while the later with better sterilization effect should be promoted in clinic.关键词
腔镜器械/浸泡消毒灭菌/过氧化氢等离子低温灭菌Key words
endoscopic equipment/immersion sterilization/low-temperature sterilization with hydrogen peroxide gas plasma分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
刘盈,唐其柱..腔镜器械两种灭菌方法的效果比较[J].中国医疗设备,2014,(11):139-141,3.
