摘要
Abstract
Objective Through clinical observation to compare two methods for the treatment of PICC puncture point infection. Methods Our department in June 2011 to May 2013 in patients with PICC catheter puncture point infection 28 cases are divided into two groups compare its curative ef ect; Dynamic group A with 0.5% iodine partial wet apply the puncture point and the surrounding: group B with hundreds states apply around the puncture point, observation of 3 ~ 5 days, record the puncture point infection status. Results Group A 3 days treatment ef ective rate of 78.5%, 5 days treatment ef ective rate of 33.3%, the total ef ective rate was 85.7%; Group B 3 days treatment effective rate of 28.5%, 5 days treatment ef ective rate was 50%, total ef ective rate was 64.2%. Therapeutic ef ect of group A is bet er than that of group B and cure time. Conclusion 0.5%energy iodine partial wet apply PICC puncture point infection curative ef ect good, and shorten the treatment time.关键词
PICC/穿刺点感染/0.5%活力碘/百多邦软膏Key words
PICC/0.5%iodine vigor/Hundreds more bang ointment
