摘要
Abstract
Objective Contrasted clinical outcomes and adverse events during the treatment of the Severe Epidemic Hemor hagic Fever by Continuous veno-venous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and Peritoneal dialysis, finding bet er treatments for the Severe Epidemic Hemor hagic Fever .Methods Col ected 24 cases with Severe Epidemic Hemor hagic Fever complicated with renal failure in our hospital, 12 cases of them were treated by CVVHDF from 2008.12~2012.5, and others were treated by peritoneal dialysis from 2005.12~2008.11. Al cases were received similarly antiviral therapy, anti-shock treatment and maintaining electrolyte balance. Compared the average duration of dialysism, the renal function partial recovery time, the renal function recovery time, the oliguria time, the mortality, average length of inhospital days, the average cost and adverse events between two groups. Results ①The basement of two groups were not dif erence.②The average duration of dialysis, the renal function partial recovery time, the renal function recovery time, the oliguria time, the mortality, average length of inhospital days and adverse events in the CVVHDF group were significantly decreased compared with the peritoneal dialysis group.③The dif erence of the average cost between two groups was not significance.Conclusion CVVHDF was bet er than peritoneal dialysis during the treatment of the Severe Epidemic Hemor hagic Fever complicated with renal failure.关键词
CVVHDF/治疗/危重型流行性出血热Key words
CVVHDF/Treatment/Severe epidemic hemor hagic fever
