| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国舰船研究|玻璃气体放电管与陶瓷气体放电管的纳秒脉冲响应特性比较

玻璃气体放电管与陶瓷气体放电管的纳秒脉冲响应特性比较

李红岩 祁国成 梁涛 李亚峰 吕峰 谢彦召

中国舰船研究Issue(2):104-108,5.
中国舰船研究Issue(2):104-108,5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2015.02.020

玻璃气体放电管与陶瓷气体放电管的纳秒脉冲响应特性比较

Comparison of the response characteristics under nanosecond pulse of spark gap protector and gas discharge tube

李红岩 1祁国成 2梁涛 1李亚峰 2吕峰 2谢彦召1

作者信息

  • 1. 西安交通大学电磁脉冲研究中心,陕西西安710049
  • 2. 中国石油天然气股份有限公司北京油气调控中心,北京100007
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Gas discharge tubes are commonly used as surge protection devices. In this paper, two different types of gas discharge tubes with the same static breakdown voltage, spark gap protector(SPG)and gas discharge tube (GDT), are chosen as research targets, whose responses subjected to the nanoseconds square pulse are compared. With the comparison results, certaln rules for their practical application and parts se⁃lection are presented. The experimental results show that, for these two types of tubes, SPG has lower ap⁃plied voltage under the same response time, while under the same applied voltage, SPG's response time is shorter. Above all, SPG has a better performance in nanosecond pulse protection than GDT does when the current is less than 3 kA. Considering its lower parasite capacitance, SPG is more suitable for the protec⁃tion of antenna systems with high operating frequency.

关键词

SPG/GDT/响应时间/纳秒脉冲/电磁脉冲

Key words

spark gap protector(SPG)/gas discharge tube(GDT)/response time/nanosecond pulse/electromagnetic pulse

分类

交通工程

引用本文复制引用

李红岩,祁国成,梁涛,李亚峰,吕峰,谢彦召..玻璃气体放电管与陶瓷气体放电管的纳秒脉冲响应特性比较[J].中国舰船研究,2015,(2):104-108,5.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51277148);陕西应用物理化学重点实验室基金资助项目;中国石油天然气集团科技项目支持 ()

中国舰船研究

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

1673-3185

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文