局解手术学杂志Issue(6)：612-614,3.DOI:10.11659/jjssx.1672-5042.201406015
两种麻醉方法下输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术的疗效比较
Comparison of two anesthesia methods within ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy
摘要
Abstract
Objectives To compare the effectiveness and safety of local anesthesia and epidural anesthesia with ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy at distal ureteral stone. Methods A total of 160 patients with distal ureteral stone treated with ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy from December 2013 to February 2014 were included. They were divided equally into 2 groups by method of random sampling. Patients in group A (n=80) treated with local anesthesia were compared to those in group B(n=80),who were dealt with epidural anesthesia. Results The statistical difference was significant in terms of hospital stay after operation and overall cost of therapy(P<0. 05) respectively,on the other hand,it was not significant in respect of the operation time,the operation successful rate,the stone clearance rate and the complications incidence rate (P>0. 05)respectively. Conclusion For the identified patients,the local anesthesia in ureteral ureteroscopic pneumatic lith-otripsy is a safe,effective and economical method for distal ureteral stone.关键词
硬膜外麻醉/局部麻醉/输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术Key words
epidural anesthesia/local anesthesia/ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
刘幸生,彭镜罗,周刚,陈尧,姜庆..两种麻醉方法下输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术的疗效比较[J].局解手术学杂志,2014,(6):612-614,3.基金项目
重庆市卫计委科技计划项目重点项目子课题(2013-10-20) （2013-10-20）
