| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国社区医师|急诊剖宫产手术中不同麻醉方式的效果比较

急诊剖宫产手术中不同麻醉方式的效果比较

谭正泉 谭洪婧 马世颖

中国社区医师Issue(6):46-46,48,2.
中国社区医师Issue(6):46-46,48,2.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2015.6.28

急诊剖宫产手术中不同麻醉方式的效果比较

Effect comparing of different anesthesia in emergency cesarean

谭正泉 1谭洪婧 1马世颖1

作者信息

  • 1. 563002贵州省遵义市第一人民医院
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To explore the clinical effect of different anesthesia application in patients with emergency cesarean delivery.Methods:80 cases of emergency cesarean delivery were selected from July 2013 to June 2014.They were divided into the control group and the observation group with 40 cases in each.The control group accepted continuous epidural anesthesia,and the observation group accepted combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.We observed the clinical anesthesia effect of the two groups. Results: The ratio of excellent anesthetic effect in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group,and the anesthesia induction time and operation time were shorter than that of the control group.The incidence rate of adverse reaction was lower than that of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia application in patients with emergency cesarean delivery had higher ratio of excellent anesthetic effect and shorter induction time and operating time which had lower incidence of adverse reactions and could achieve the ideal anesthetic effect.

关键词

急诊剖宫产/连续硬膜外麻醉/腰-硬膜外联合麻醉

Key words

Emergency cesarean section/Continuous epidural anesthesia/Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia

引用本文复制引用

谭正泉,谭洪婧,马世颖..急诊剖宫产手术中不同麻醉方式的效果比较[J].中国社区医师,2015,(6):46-46,48,2.

中国社区医师

1007-614X

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文