中国社区医师Issue(8)：90-90,92,2.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2015.8.56
3种交叉配血方法的比较
Comparison of 3 kinds of cross matching method
马砚敏 1赵凤莲 1支君 1宋慧敏1
作者信息
- 1. 453000河南省新乡市第一人民医院输血科
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective:To compare the experiment effects of 3 kinds of cross matching method.Methods:Saline medium matching method,polybrene matching method, microcolumn gel cassette matching method.Results:The donor recipient used ABO blood type and Rh(D) blood type with same type matching.The saline medium matching method were all negative.4 cases of primary side were positive in polybrene matching method(cause:the irregular antibody screening of blood recipients were positive);5 cases of secondary side were positive(cause:the direct anti globulin experiment of blood recipients were positive in 4 cases;the irregular antibody screening of blood donors were positive in 1 case).22 cases of primary side were positive in microcolumn gel cassette matching method(cause:the irregular antibody screening of blood recipients were positive in 4 cases,consistented with polybrene method,18 cases were false positive);50 cases of secondary side were positive(cause:the direct anti globulin experiment of blood recipients were positive in 44 cases,the irregular antibody screening of blood donors were positive in 2 cases,4 cases were false positive).Conclusion:3 kinds of cross matching method each have its advantages and disadvantages,using different methods make cross matching test in work can improve the accuracy of test results,and ensure the safety of clinical blood transfusion.关键词
盐水介质配血法/凝聚胺配血法/微柱凝胶卡式配血法/交叉配血Key words
Saline medium matching method/Polybrene matching method/Microcolumn gel cassette matching method/Cross matching引用本文复制引用
马砚敏,赵凤莲,支君,宋慧敏..3种交叉配血方法的比较[J].中国社区医师,2015,(8):90-90,92,2.
