中国社区医师Issue(16)：21-22,2.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2015.16.14
腹股沟疝患者89例的不同手术治疗方式的效果评价
Effect evaluation of different operative treatment methods in 89 patients with inguinal hernia
摘要
Abstract
Objective:To explore the clinical curative effects and postoperative situations of different operative treatment methods in 89 patients with inguinal hernia.Methods:89 male patients with inguinal hernia were selected.They were divided into 3 groups according to the different operative methods.The traditional repair group had 23 cases,Holypro group had 38 cases,Bard group had 28 cases.The postoperative recovery and complications were compared between 3 groups.Results:The average repair time, average postoperative hospitalization time,average offbed time,scrotal edema,uroschesis,wound pain and postoperative recurrence of Holypro group and Bard group were significantly stronger than those of the traditional repair group(P<0.05).The uroschesis incidence rate of Holypro group was significantly higher than that of Bard group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The non-tension herniorrhaphy is significantly better than traditional herniorrhaphy,and wherein the effect of Holypro patch is close to the effect of Bard patch.关键词
腹股沟疝/无张力疝修补术/补片Key words
Inguinal hernia/Non-tension herniorrhaphy/Patch引用本文复制引用
范学智..腹股沟疝患者89例的不同手术治疗方式的效果评价[J].中国社区医师,2015,(16):21-22,2.
