| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国药房|辛伐他汀对比普伐他汀治疗高脂血症疗效和安全性的Meta分析

辛伐他汀对比普伐他汀治疗高脂血症疗效和安全性的Meta分析

刘一 张春燕 陈月 黄婧 冯婉玉

中国药房Issue(18):2513-2516,2517,5.
中国药房Issue(18):2513-2516,2517,5.DOI:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2015.18.23

辛伐他汀对比普伐他汀治疗高脂血症疗效和安全性的Meta分析

Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Simvastatin vs. Pravastatin in the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia

刘一 1张春燕 1陈月 1黄婧 1冯婉玉1

作者信息

  • 1. 北京大学人民医院药剂科,北京 100044
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of simvastatin vs. pravastatin in the treatment of hy-perlipidemia,and provide evidence-based reference for the clinical treatment. METHODS:PubMed,Medline,EMBase,Cochrane Library and CJFD were retrieved to collect the randomized controlled trial(RCT)of efficacy and safety of simvastatin(test group) and pravastatin (control group) in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated. The Rev Man 5.2 software was chosen for data analysis. RESULTS:14 RCT involving 1 019 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that simvastatin had more significant effect in the decreasing of TC [MD=-0.34,95%CI(-0.52,-0.16),P<0.001] and LDL-C[MD=-0.31,95%CI(-0.45,-0.17),P<0.001] than pravastatin;and simvastatin and pravastatin had the similar effect in TG[MD=-0.06,95%CI(-0.18,0.05),P=0.28)] and HDL-C[MD=0.00,95%CI(-0.04,0.04),P=0.85]. Adverse drug reaction rate results showed they were similar[OR=0.70,95%CI(0.36,1.39),P=0.31]. CONCLUSIONS:Simvastatin is more effective in lipid-lowering than pravastatin with similar safety. Due to the limited number and low quality of included studies,it remains to be further verified with more reasonably designed,multi-center and large-sample studies.

关键词

辛伐他汀/普伐他汀/高脂血症/Meta分析/疗效/安全性

Key words

Simvastatin/Pravastatin/Hyperlipidemia/Meta-analysis/Efficacy/Safety

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

刘一,张春燕,陈月,黄婧,冯婉玉..辛伐他汀对比普伐他汀治疗高脂血症疗效和安全性的Meta分析[J].中国药房,2015,(18):2513-2516,2517,5.

基金项目

国家卫生和计划生育委员会药物政策与基本药物制度司委托课题 ()

中国药房

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1001-0408

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文