摘要
Abstract
Objective:To explore and compare the efficacy of disposable root canal therapy and conventional root canal therapy treated in periapical.Method: 174 patients who were selected from our hospital during July 1, 2012 and January 1, 2014 were divided into two groups (control group and observation group) randomly, and each group contained 87 cases. The observation group was treated by disposable root canal therapy, and the control group was treated by conventional root canal therapy, and then to compare the pain degree between the two groups during the treatment, and record and compare the effectiveness of the two groups in the following year.Result: In the observation group, 83 cases belonged to 0 degree pain, 2 cases belonged to 1 degree pain, 2 cases belonged to 2 degree pain, pain incidence was 4.6%. In the control group,82 cases belonged to 0 degree pain,3 cases cases belonged to 2 degree pain, 2 cases belonged to 2 degree pain, pain incidence was 5.7%, and the difference was not significant (P>0.05). After a year follow-up, in the observation group, the cured number of patients was 67, the effective number of patients was 18, the invalid number of patients was 1, the effective rate was 97.8%. In the control group, the cured number of patients was 67, the effective number of patients was 19, the invalid number of patients was 2, the effective rate was 98.9%, and the difference was not significant (P>0.05).Conclusion: For periapical patients, disposable root canal therapy and conventional root canal therapy all can get a good efficiency, but disposable root canal therapy can greatly reduce the patients’ pain and is helpful for patient’s recovery, so it is worth to promote in clinical.关键词
一次性根管治疗/常规/有效率/疼痛级别Key words
Root canal therapy/Routine/Efficiency/Pain level
