| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国医药科学|两种方法治疗桡骨远端不稳定型骨折临床疗效比较

两种方法治疗桡骨远端不稳定型骨折临床疗效比较

任东

中国医药科学Issue(5):204-206,3.
中国医药科学Issue(5):204-206,3.

两种方法治疗桡骨远端不稳定型骨折临床疗效比较

Clinical efficacy of two methods for treatment of unstable distal radius fracture

任东1

作者信息

  • 1. 内蒙古自治区巴彦淖尔市临河区人民医院骨科,内蒙古巴彦淖尔015000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To discuss clinical efficacy of Kirschner wire fixation combined with external fixation and plates internal fixation for treatment of unstable distal radius fracture. Methods Clinical data of 50cases with unstable distal radius fracture were analyzed. 24 cases were treated by Kirschner wire fixation combined with external fixation, and 26 cases were treated by plates internal fixation. Clinical efficacy were compared between two groups. Results After operation, wrist joint activity and excellent fracture healing rates of combined group showed no significant difference combined to group of plates internal fixation(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared to plates internal fixation, Kirschner wire fixation combined with external fixation for unstable distal radius fracture shows same clinical efficacy. But it shows advantages of surgical trauma, avoiding secondary operation, worthy of clinical application.

关键词

桡骨远端不稳定型骨折/克氏针/外固定支架/钢板内固定

Key words

Unstable distal radius fracture/Kirschner wire/External fixation/Plates internal fixation

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

任东..两种方法治疗桡骨远端不稳定型骨折临床疗效比较[J].中国医药科学,2014,(5):204-206,3.

中国医药科学

2095-0616

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文