| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国医药科学|环抱型肋骨钢板和可吸收性肋骨钉治疗肋骨骨折的固定效果比较

环抱型肋骨钢板和可吸收性肋骨钉治疗肋骨骨折的固定效果比较

张栋军

中国医药科学Issue(8):178-180,3.
中国医药科学Issue(8):178-180,3.

环抱型肋骨钢板和可吸收性肋骨钉治疗肋骨骨折的固定效果比较

Fixed effect comparison of surrounded rib plate and absorbable rib nails in the treatment of rib fracture

张栋军1

作者信息

  • 1. 广东省佛山市南海区第三人民医院普外科,广东佛山528200
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the fixed effect of surrounded rib plate and absorbable rib nails in the treatment of rib fracture. Methods 120 cases of patients with rib fracture were selected as research object, who received surgery in our hospital. They were divided into two groups according to treatment method. Group A (60 cases) were fixed by surrounded rib plate. Group B(60 cases) were fixed by absorbable rib nails. The fixed effect was then compared. Results Both groups successfully completed surgery, with fracture healing. Operation time, operation bleeding and subjective pain score of both groups had no significant difference(P>0.05) by comparision. The hospitalization time of group A was significantly shorter than the group B(P<0.05). The complication rate of group A was 6.67%, and the group B was 18.33%. There was no significant difference between groups(P>0.05). Follow up of 6 months to review the chest X-ray, group A had no fracture displacement, and group B had 3 cases fracture displacement. Conclusion The fixed effect of surrounded rib plate is better than absorbable rib nails, which is worthy of application.

关键词

环抱型肋骨钢板/可吸收性肋骨钉/肋骨骨折/固定效果

Key words

Surrounded rib plate/Absorbable rib nails/Rib fracture/Fixed effect

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

张栋军..环抱型肋骨钢板和可吸收性肋骨钉治疗肋骨骨折的固定效果比较[J].中国医药科学,2015,(8):178-180,3.

中国医药科学

2095-0616

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文