| 注册
首页|期刊导航|针灸临床杂志|国内针刺与西药治疗紧张型头痛疗效比较的系统评价

国内针刺与西药治疗紧张型头痛疗效比较的系统评价

胡琳 肖义萍

针灸临床杂志Issue(7):63-66,4.
针灸临床杂志Issue(7):63-66,4.

国内针刺与西药治疗紧张型头痛疗效比较的系统评价

Acupuncture versus Western Medicine for Tension-type Headache in China:A Systematic Review

胡琳 1肖义萍1

作者信息

  • 1. 郫县中医医院,四川郫县611730
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To assess the efficacy of acupuncture versus western medicine in the treatment of tension-type headache in China.Methods:Randomized controlled trials ( RCTs) involving acupuncture versus west-ern medicine in the treatment of tension-type headache in China were identified from CNKI, VIP, WANFANG Database and CBM.We also manually searched all kinds of magazines of traditional Chinese medicine and com-prehensive periodicals.Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently with a specially de-signed extraction form.The Cochrane Collaboration’ s RevMan5.2 software was used for data analysis.Results:There were totally 356 retrieved documents.Ultimately 9 articles met the inclusion criteria,and they included 598 subjects.Extracted data for Meta analysis:Efficiency:Acupuncture was better than only Western medicine&nbsp;[OR=3.94,95%CI=(2.37,6.56),Z=5.28(P<0.00001)].Pain VAS:Acupuncture was better than med-icine in reducing the degree of pain[MD=-0.58,95%CI=(-0.63,-0.52),P<0.00001].Conclusion:Existing domestic clinical evidence suggests that the curative effect of acupuncture treatment on tension-type headache compared with western medicine has certain advantages, but it still needs more high-quality random-ized controlled trials to confirm the curative effect of acupuncture treatment on tension-type headache.

关键词

紧张型头痛/针刺/随机对照试验/系统评价

Key words

Tension-type headache/Acupuncture/Randomized controlled trials/Systematic review

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

胡琳,肖义萍..国内针刺与西药治疗紧张型头痛疗效比较的系统评价[J].针灸临床杂志,2015,(7):63-66,4.

针灸临床杂志

OACSTPCD

1005-0779

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文