填充式无张力疝修补术与平片无张力疝修补术的临床应用效果比较OA
Clinical application effect comparison of filling tension-free hernia repair and plain film tension-free hernia repair
目的：比较填充式无张力疝修补术与平片无张力疝修补术的临床应用效果。方法选取本院2012年1月~2014年12月收治的31例行填充式无张力疝修补术患者作为填充组，12例平片无张力疝修补术患者作为平片组，比较两组的临床应用效果。结果两组的手术时间、住院时间、疼痛持续时间、用止痛药次数、恢复工作时间比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。填充组的住院总费用显著高于平片组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组的并发症发生率比较，差异无统计学…查看全部>>
Objective To compare the clinical application effect comparison of filling tension-free hernia repair and plain film tension-free hernia repair. Methods 31 patients received filling tension-free hernia repair from January 2012 to December 2014 in our hospital were selected as the filling group and 12 patients received plain film tension-free hernia repair were selected as the plain film group.The clinical application effect in two groups was compared. …查看全部>>
张世发;邓英
兰州市第二人民医院，兰州 730046兰州市第二人民医院，兰州 730046
医药卫生
填充式无张力疝修补术平片无张力疝修补术应用效果
Filling tension-free hernia repairPlain film tension-free hernia repairApplication effect
《中国当代医药》 2015 (21)
33-34,37,3
评论