摘要
Abstract
Objective To explore the clinical diagnostic effect of immunohistochemical technique and routine technique on the pathological diagnosis. Methods 56 cancer patients admitted into our hospital were analyzed.According to dif-ferent pathological diagnostic methods,they were divided into control group (n=28) and experimental group (n=28).In the control group,biopsy puncture for diagnosis was applied,while in the experimental group,immunohistochemical technique for diagnosis was adopted.The positive diagnostic rate of these two methods was compared. Results In the experimental group,after immunohistochemical staining,cell structure was in variance,24 cases were abnormal expression for AFP and Glypican-3,and the positive rate was 85.7%,which was significantly higher than that in the control group (14 cases, 50.0%).The satisfaction rate in the experimental group was 82.1%,which was much higher than that in the control group accounting for 57.1%.In the experimental group,after diagnosis,the scores of psychological concerns,physiological as-pects,and sense of trust were (87.43±4.29),(88.30±9.10),(91.34±10.77) points,which were all greatly higher than those in the control group [(69.98±3.45),(70.11±4.36),(72.37±5.89) points],there were all statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of implementing immunohistochemical technique for pathological diagnosis in cancer pa-tients is optimal,which is worthy of promotion.关键词
免疫组化技术/常规技术/病理诊断/诊断效果Key words
Immunohistochemical technique/Routine technique/Pathological diagnosis/Diagnostic effect分类
医药卫生
