摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the treatment effect of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate and transurethral resection of prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods100 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia patients treated in our hospital from May 2012 to February 2014 as the research object,were randomly divided into two groups,each of 50 cases,patients in observation group were treated by transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate,the control group underwent transurethral resection of prostate,compared two groups of operation,treatment effect (IPSS score,Qmax,RUV) and complications. Results The amount of bleeding in operation of two groups [(32.2±6.4)VS(50.3±8)]mL, catheter indwelling time [(5.5±0.5VS (7.0±0.4)]d and hospitalization time [(6.5±0.5) VS (10.1±0.8)]d, were significant difference(P<0.05). The complication rate of observation group 8%,compared with control group of 24%,difference was significant(P<0.05).In addition,IPSS score,Qmax,RUV difference was no statistical significance after treatment (P>0.05).ConclusionPKRP and TURP in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia is good,but the former is more secure,with less complications.关键词
经尿道前列腺电切术/经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术/良性前列腺增生/应用效果Key words
PKRP/TURP/Benign prostatic hyperplasia/Application effect分类
医药卫生
