摘要
Abstract
BACKGROUND:There is no unified conclusion on the efficacy of immediate implantation and restoration. Some studies have shown that the success rate and aesthetic effect of immediate implantation are better than those of delayed implantation. However, in other studies, the immediate implantation has no difference from the delayed implantation, and it also has safety hazards. OBJECTIVE:To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of BLB implant for immediate implantation and delayed implantation. METHODS:Eighty patients undergoing denture implantation and restoration, 35 males and 45 females, aged 20-52 years were equaly divided into research group treated with immediate implantation of BLB implant and control group treated with delayed implantation. Crown restoration was completed at 3 months after implantation. Then, the patients were folowed up for 6 months to observe the implant stability, implantation efficacy and adverse effects. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:There was no intra-group or intergroup difference in the implant stability quotients of two groups at 1, 3, 6 months after restoration (P> 0.05). The total effective rate was 95% in the research group and 90% in the control group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the research group, there was one case of gingivitis and one case of lower lip numbness; in the control group, there were two cases of wound infection and one case of lower lip numbness, but there was no difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). These findings indicate that BLB implant has good efficacy and safety both in immediate implantation and delayed implantation.关键词
生物材料/口腔生物材料/即刻种植/即刻修复/BLB种植体/延期种植Key words
Dental Implants/Immediate Dental Implant Loading/Crowns分类
医药卫生
