摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effect of unprotected perineal delivery and lateral episiotomy delivery. Methods 101 puerpera in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2014 were selected as research objects.All puerpera were given perineal delivery,and were divided into the lateral episiotomy group (39 puerpera) and the unpro-tected group (62 puerpera).The lateral episiotomy group was given perineal episiotomy and conventional perineal protec-tion delivery by supporting anus,the unprotected group was given unprotected perineal delivery.Time of the second stage of labor,Apgar scores,intrapartum hemorrhage,degree of pain and swelling of perineal wound,recovery of perineal wound in two groups was compared. Results There was no significant difference in time of the second stage of labor, Apgar score,intrapartum hemorrhage between two groups (P>0.05).Degree of pain and swelling of perineal wound in the first day in the unprotected group was lower than that in the lateral episiotomy group,with significant difference (P<0.05).The perineal wound healing in the unprotected group was better than that in the lateral episiotomy group,with significant difference(P<0.05). Conclusion Unprotected perineal delivery does not increase the time of the second stage of labor,has no adverse effects on neonatal outcome,which can alleviate the degree of pain and swelling of perineal wound,and has fast recovery time,it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.关键词
无保护会阴接生法/会阴侧切/分娩Key words
Unprotected perineal delivery/Lateral episiotomy/Delivery分类
医药卫生
