| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国美容医学|两种不同系统种植体边缘骨吸收的比较研究

两种不同系统种植体边缘骨吸收的比较研究

何孔炎 李建成 陈艳

中国美容医学Issue(11):80-83,4.
中国美容医学Issue(11):80-83,4.

两种不同系统种植体边缘骨吸收的比较研究

Comparative research on marginal bone resorption of two implant systems

何孔炎 1李建成 1陈艳1

作者信息

  • 1. 福建医科大学附属闽东医院口腔科 福建 福安 355000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the marginal bone resorption of two implant systems which were applied to the restoration of single tooth missings. Methods 60 patients of single odontoptosis were divided into two groups with 30 patients in each group. Patients of different groups were treated by Xive impant system and Ankylos impant system. Orthopantomographies were taken on the operation day,3 months,6months,and 12 months after implant placement. Marginal bone altitude and marginal bone loss were measured on the orthopantomographies. All data were statistically analyzed by SPSS14.0 software. Rusults There were no severe complications in the both groups,and the stability in initial stage was good. Marginal bone resorption of 4.5mm Xive impant on the operation day, 3rd month, 6th month ,and 12th month after implant placement were(0.42 ± 0.28),(0.81 ± 0.34),(1.24 ± 0.38),(1.69 ± 0.42)mm.Marginal bone resorption of 4.5 mm Ankylos impant on the operation day, 3rd month,6th month,and 12th month after implant placement were(0.32±0.23),(0.36±0.27),(0.42±0.3), (0.52 ± 0.31)mm. There were statistically significant differences in marginal bone resorption between the two implant systems(P<0.05). The mean marginal bone resorption of Xive impant(1.06mm) was higher than that of Ankylos impant(0.42mm). Conclusion Ankylos impant which is designed by platform switching could reserve the marginal bone altitude better than Xive impant which is designed by platform joint in one years function load.

关键词

种植系统/边缘骨吸收/平台转移

Key words

implant systems/marginal bone resorption/platform switching

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

何孔炎,李建成,陈艳..两种不同系统种植体边缘骨吸收的比较研究[J].中国美容医学,2015,(11):80-83,4.

中国美容医学

OACSTPCD

1008-6455

访问量4
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文