中国现代医生Issue(27)：8-10,3.
伤椎置钉内固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的疗效评价
A clinical control study of screws through fractured pedical arch operat-ing method versus traditional operating method for thoracolumbar burst fracture
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effect of the two operating methods: screws through fractured pedical arch operating method versus traditional operating method in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures, to confirm the clinical advantages of screws through fractured pedical arch operating method in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods A total of 62 cases suffered from thoracolumbar burst fractures were divided into two groups:screws through fractured pedical arch operating method group (n=27) and traditional operating method group (n=35). Each group was undergone the corresponding operation. The clinical results were evaluated between two groups. Results Patients in the screws through fractured pedical arch group by contrast to traditional group, margin height, Cobb's angle, internal fixation failure rates and area of vertebral canal were different, there was significant differences (P<0.01). Conclusion Screws through fractured pedical arch operating method had many advantages, which had a promising clinical applica-tion in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.关键词
胸腰椎爆裂性骨折/伤椎置钉/内固定Key words
Thoracolumbar burst fracture/Screws through fractured pedical arch/Internal fixation分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
于志勇,白龙,叶军,陈科明,林龙波,刘大洲..伤椎置钉内固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的疗效评价[J].中国现代医生,2014,(27):8-10,3.基金项目
广东省深圳市宝安区科学技术局 （）
