| 注册
首页|期刊导航|解放军医学院学报|复合乳酸菌治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病的效果分析

复合乳酸菌治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病的效果分析

贺星 王晓辉 闫志辉 李超 弓三东 崔立红

解放军医学院学报Issue(10):987-990,4.
解放军医学院学报Issue(10):987-990,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.10.007

复合乳酸菌治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病的效果分析

Efficacy of composite lactobacillus in patients with non-alcoholicfatty liver disease

贺星 1王晓辉 1闫志辉 1李超 1弓三东 1崔立红1

作者信息

  • 1. 海军总医院 消化内科,北京 100048
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of composite lactobacillus in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Methods From June 2011 to June 2014, 114 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in our hospital were chosen as research objects. All patients were randomly divided into observation group (n=57) and control group (n=57). Patients in observation group received composite lactobacillus (0.66 g, 3/d, 16 weeks) combined with life-style intervention, while patients in control group only received life-style intervention. After 16 weeks of treatment, the differences of liver function, serum lipid levels, inflammatory cytokines, body mass index, insulin resistance index and treatment effect before and after treatment in observation group and control group were compared. Results After treatment, the serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT, control group 86.65±28.34 vs 76.19±23.32; observation group 85.41±27.59 vs 66.81±26.76), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, control group 69.73±24.74 vs 60.49±18.15; observation group 68.35±26.62 vs 53.12±19.59), triglycerides (TG, control group 3.59±0.48 vs 3.35±0.43;observation group 3.75±0.46 vs 2.83±0.37), total cholesterol (TC, control group 6.17±0.76 vs 5.83±0.52; observation group 6.15±0.81 vs 5.54±0.69), interleukins-6 (IL-6, control group 135.64±12.14 vs 129.94±11.36; observation group 133.67±13.25 vs 97.86±11.82), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α, control group 10.69±3.23 vs 8.84±3.17; observation group 10.68±3.43 vs 7.29±1.75), body mass index (BMI, control group 31.34±2.35 vs 30.02±2.31; observation group 31.58±2.36 vs 28.12±2.23), insulin resistance index (IR, control group 2.77±0.38 vs 2.62±0.34; observation group 2.79±0.39 vs 2.46±0.33) in both observation group and control group were lower than before treatment (P < 0.05), and the observation group (ALT: 66.81±26.76;AST: 53.12±19.59; TG: 2.83±0.37; TC: 5.54±0.69; IL-6: 97.86±11.82; TNF-α: 7.29±1.75; BMI: 28.12±2.23; IR: 2.46±0.33) decreased more significantly than control group (ALT: 76.19±23.32; AST: 60.49±18.15; TG: 3.35±0.43; TC: 5.83±0.72; IL-6:129.94±11.36; TNF-α: 8.84±3.17; BMI: 30.02±2.31; IR: 2.62±0.34, P < 0.05). The curative effect in observation group were superior to control group (73.68% vs 36.84%), P < 0.05). Conclusion Composite lactobacillus can improve liver function, serum lipid levels, inflammatory cytokines, body mass index, insulin resistance index and its treatment effect is significant.

关键词

非酒精性脂肪性肝病/复合乳酸菌/血脂异常/代谢疾病

Key words

non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/composite lactobacillus/dyslipidemia/metabolic diseases

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

贺星,王晓辉,闫志辉,李超,弓三东,崔立红..复合乳酸菌治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病的效果分析[J].解放军医学院学报,2015,(10):987-990,4.

基金项目

海军后勤科研计划课题(CHJ12J027)Supported by the Foundation of Logistics of Chinese Navy(CHJ12J027) (CHJ12J027)

解放军医学院学报

OACSTPCD

2095-5227

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文