| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国伤残医学|交锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板内固定治疗胫骨骨折的临床疗效比较

交锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板内固定治疗胫骨骨折的临床疗效比较

袁志坤 罗鹰

中国伤残医学Issue(24):1-2,2.
中国伤残医学Issue(24):1-2,2.DOI:10.13214/j.cnki.cjotadm.2015.24.001

交锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板内固定治疗胫骨骨折的临床疗效比较

Interlocking inrt amedullary nail and lock ing clinical comparison of plate internla fixation for treatment of tibial fracture pressure

袁志坤 1罗鹰1

作者信息

  • 1. 东莞市石碣医院,广东东莞 523000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Ab stract Obj ective:To compare the effect of locking compression plate and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation of tibial frac -tures.Methods:68 cases of tibial fractures were randomly divided into A , group B, 34 cases each.A group with locking compression plate fixation treatment , group B interlocking intramedullary nail fixation treatment .Resulst :of surgical patients were successful .Postop-erative x-ray prompt basic anatomical reduction reached 12 to 24-month follow-up period, an average of 18 months, were no loosening and fracture, limb shortening, knee and ankle joints flexing good functional recovery .A group of excellent in 26 cases, good in8 cases, differential cases, good rate 100%;group B patients were 29,4,1 and 97.059%.Goodrates compared to the two groups have no signifi-cantly meaning, P>0.05.Conclusion :locking compression plate , fixation of tibial fracture treatment satisfaction efficacy interlocking in-tramedullary nail ,was no significant difference between the two therapies .

关键词

胫骨骨折/交锁髓内钉/加压钢板固定

Key words

Tibial fractures/Interlocking intramedullary/Compression plate fixation

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

袁志坤,罗鹰..交锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板内固定治疗胫骨骨折的临床疗效比较[J].中国伤残医学,2015,(24):1-2,2.

中国伤残医学

1673-6567

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文