中国组织工程研究Issue(7)：1265-1272,8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.07.022
跑节省化、最大摄氧量评价普通人有氧耐力的效果比较**☆
Running economy versus maximal oxygen uptake to evaluate the endurance level of ordinary people
摘要
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the difference between running economy and in evaluating the endurance level of competitive athletes is conclusive, little research has been done on their evaluation effect in ordinary people. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of running economy and maximal oxygen uptake in evaluating the aerobic endurance level of ordinary people. METHODS: Total y 63 recruits (strictly screened to ensure that the objects meet the level of ordinary people) were enrol ed as the study objects, and 5 km performance was tested. The maximal oxygen uptake and running economy were tested on indoor treadmil in an incremental load exercise mode, with the gradient as 0. As to maximal oxygen uptake test, the speed was increased gradual y from 8.5 km/h until the objects were exhausted and the maximal oxygen uptake criterion was met; as to running economy test, the speed was increased from 8.5 km/h to 11.5 km/h, then the speed of 11.5 km/h was kept for 3 minutes, and the mean value of the oxygen uptake in the last 2 minutes was calculated as the running economy value. The relationship of 5 km performance to maximal oxygen uptake and running economy was analyzed and compared by Pearson correlation during statistics. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There was a high-positive correlation between 5 km performance and the running economy relative value (r=0.797, P=0.000) and a low-negative correlation between 5 km performance and maximal oxygen uptake (r=-0.317, P=0.056). Besides, as step test and outdoor 800-meter or 1 000-meter running commonly used in national physique monitoring are restrained by various factors, undoubted, simple, reliable and practical RE provides a new way for accurate evaluation of national physique.关键词
组织构建/组织构建基础实验/最大摄氧量/跑节省化/耐力/国民体质/台阶试验/800 m 耐力跑/1 000 m 耐力跑/普通人/心肺功能/体质评价/省级基金分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
王国军,温含,武雅琼..跑节省化、最大摄氧量评价普通人有氧耐力的效果比较**☆[J].中国组织工程研究,2013,(7):1265-1272,8.基金项目
上海市科学技术委员会2010“创新行动计划”专项项目(10490503500)；湖南省教育厅科研项目(09C556)。Supported by:2010 Innovation Action Plan Projects of Shanghai Science Commit ee, No.10490503500* （10490503500）
the Science and Technology Program of Hunan Provincial Educational Bureau, No.09C556* （）
