中国组织工程研究Issue(17)：3089-3093,5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.17.007
传统方法与快速曲面方法进行复杂曲面重建的比较*
Comparison of classical surfacing and rapid surfacing for complex surface reconstruction
摘要
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Reverse engineering technology has been widely used in surgery, and how to produce the model that meet the rapid prototyping processing rapidly and effectively has attracted more and more attention. <br> OBJECTIVE:To compare the classical surfacing and rapid surfacing for complex surface reconstruction based on the summary of the commonly used surface reconstruction modeling technique. <br> METHODS:VIVID9i non-contact three-dimensional digital scanner produced by Konica, Japan was used to perform the three-dimensional coordinate measuring on faces of 30 col ege students. The classical surfacing and rapid surfacing approaches were used to surfacing reconstruct the facial point cloud data, and to perform error analysis and smoothness evaluation. <br> RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The results show that the maximum distance of surfaces and point clouds reconstructed with the classical surfacing and rapid surfacing approaches were 2.99 mm and 0.69 mm. The surface made by classical surfacing approach was smoother than that made by rapid surfacing approach. There is a conclusion that rapid surfacing approach is more efficient method for complex surface reconstruction, and provides a reference for the three-dimensional reconstruction of complex surfaces.关键词
骨关节植入物/数字化骨科/逆向工程/曲面重构/复杂曲面重建/面部整形/Imageware/Geomagic/省级基金Key words
bone and joint implants/digital orthopedics/reverse engineering/surface reconstruction/complex surface reconstruction/facial plastic/Imageware/Geomagic/provincial grants-supported paper分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
王秉操,王殊轶,毕东东,郑加宽,刘斌..传统方法与快速曲面方法进行复杂曲面重建的比较*[J].中国组织工程研究,2013,(17):3089-3093,5.基金项目
获上海市教委科研创新项目资助(12YZ098)。 （12YZ098）
