中国医学创新Issue(22)：9-11,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2013.22.004
短疗程对比长疗程体外反搏治疗慢性稳定型心绞痛疗效观察
Observation on the Efficacy of Treating Chronic Stable Angina by Short-term Enhanced External Counter-pulsation and Long-term Enhanced External Counter-pulsation
袁跃龙 1侯明英 1向琳 1谢辉 1刘静 1侯云菊 1谢远容 1杨萍 1李峙澄1
作者信息
- 1. 重庆市永川区人民医院 重庆 402160
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective:To research the efficacy of treating chronic stable angina by short-term enhanced external counter-pulsation and long-term enhanced external counter-pulsation.Method:The 289 chronic stable angina patients were randomly assigned to the control group(group one n=95),the short-term treatment group by enhanced external counter-pulsation(group two n=97)and the long-term treatment group by enhanced external counter-pulsation(group three n=95). The follow-up period was 3 months. Then the rate of angina relief,the endpoint of angina scores and SF-36 score were compared after the treatment.Result:In the end of follow-up,the effective rate of group one,group two and group three were 80.00%,91.75%,94.74%respectively. Group two and group three were superior to group one in the indicators such as the rate of angina relief,the endpoint of angina scores and SF-36 score(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between group two and group three(P>0.05).Conclusion:There is no difference in treating chronic stable angina between the short-term and long-term enhanced external counter-pulsation,which are superior to drug therapy.关键词
体外反搏/冠心病/慢性稳定型心绞痛Key words
Enhanced external counter-pulsation/Coronary disease/Chronic stable angina引用本文复制引用
袁跃龙,侯明英,向琳,谢辉,刘静,侯云菊,谢远容,杨萍,李峙澄..短疗程对比长疗程体外反搏治疗慢性稳定型心绞痛疗效观察[J].中国医学创新,2013,(22):9-11,3.
