中国医药科学Issue(18)：170-172,3.
桡骨远端粉碎性骨折的小夹板与支架外固定治疗的临床疗效比较
Comparison of clinical efficacy of small splint and external fixator immobilization treatment of distal radius comminuted fracture
任定宝 1王恩斌 1苏明华 1申云杰 1蔡立雄2
作者信息
- 1. 云南省保山市中医院骨伤科二病区，云南保山 678000
- 2. 广东省佛山市中医院骨伤科6科，广东佛山 528000
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effect of small splint and external fixator immobilization in the treatment of distal radius comminuted fracture. Methods 56 patients with distal radius comminuted fracture, who were diagnosed and treated in our hospital from January 2012 to June 2013, were selected and were randomly divided into small splint fixation group and external fixator immobilization group. To treated the two groups according to corresponding fixation methods, to make reduction and function evaluation during the follow-up process of the two groups after discharge, to make statistics and dispose the patients' complication.ResultsTo follow-up 3-21 months with the average follow-up time of 14.1 months. The excellent efficacy evaluation in small splint fixation group(15 cases) with the excellent and good rate of 53.6%(15/28), while which in external fixator immobilization group(24 cases) with the excellent and good rate of 85.7%(24/28), the differences were statically significant(P<0.05). The complication had occurred in the two groups, the symptoms of which were remission and elimination progressively. Conclusion The problem of how to keep the stability of fracture after reduction on the treatment of distal radius comminuted fracture should be solved and be attention. External fixator immobilization is obviously better on reductive maintenance and recovery function compared with which of small splint fixation, is worthy of further clinical study.关键词
桡骨远端粉碎性骨折/小夹板外固定/支架外固定Key words
Distal radius comminuted fracture/Small splint fixation/External fixator immobilization分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
任定宝,王恩斌,苏明华,申云杰,蔡立雄..桡骨远端粉碎性骨折的小夹板与支架外固定治疗的临床疗效比较[J].中国医药科学,2015,(18):170-172,3.
