| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中外医学研究|ELISA与ICA对癌胚抗原检测的比较

ELISA与ICA对癌胚抗原检测的比较

彭文忠 余高冰

中外医学研究Issue(21):147-148,2.
中外医学研究Issue(21):147-148,2.

ELISA与ICA对癌胚抗原检测的比较

The Comparison of ELISA And ICA in Carcinoembryonic Antigen Detection

彭文忠 1余高冰1

作者信息

  • 1. 深圳市宝安区西乡人民医院 广东 深圳 518102
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To compare magnetic particle capture immune luminescence(ICA) method and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) in determination of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) results,and understanding these two methods advantages and disadvantages and discuss ICA and ELISA detection of CEA sensitivity and accuracy.Methods:ICA and ELISA contrast test,recovery test and precision test.Results:Contrast test,Y was ICA method measured CEA content,X was ELISA measured CEA content,the regression equation:Y=1.32X+8.23,correlation coefficient r=0.991.Recovery test,with the ICA and ELSIA average recovery rate was 97.64%and 96.73%.The accuracy test,ELISA and the group of ICA in precision were 11.74%and 1.92%respectively. Batch precision was between 15.41%and 3.68%respectively.Conclusion:ICA and ELISA linear correlation is better,in the group,and group were superior to that of ELISA method between precision,ICA has high accuracy,stability is strong,ICA recovery than ELISA is high,the ICA in detection accuracy and stability compared with ELISA has a strong advantage.

关键词

磁粒子捕获免疫发光/酶联免疫吸附分析/癌胚抗原

Key words

Magnetic particle capture immune light/Enzyme linked immunosorbent analysis/Carcinoembryonic antigen

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

彭文忠,余高冰..ELISA与ICA对癌胚抗原检测的比较[J].中外医学研究,2013,(21):147-148,2.

中外医学研究

1674-6805

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文