| 注册
首页|期刊导航|临床医学工程|微创经皮和传统开放椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床效果比较

微创经皮和传统开放椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床效果比较

王军 黄健 郭伟康

临床医学工程2016,Vol.23Issue(1):31-32,2.
临床医学工程2016,Vol.23Issue(1):31-32,2.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2016.01.0031

微创经皮和传统开放椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床效果比较

Comparison on the Clinical Effects of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous and Conventional Open Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Fractures

王军 1黄健 1郭伟康1

作者信息

  • 1. 梅州市人民医院/中山大学附属梅州医院关节外科, 广东梅州514031
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To observe the clinical effects of minimally invasive percutaneous and conventional open pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods 90 patients with thoracolumbar fractures were randomly divided into control group (traditional open pedicle screw internal fixation treatment) and observation group (minimally invasive percutaneous surgery). The preoperative parameters and imaging indicators of two groups were compared. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and other perioperative parameters of observation group were significantly better than those of control group (P<0.05). The anterior vertebral body height after surgery immediately of observation group was significantly better than that of control group (P <0.05), however, no statistical difference was found between two groups in imaging indicators 1 year after surgery (P>0.05). Conclusions Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation has better effect than traditional open pedicle screw fixation, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

关键词

胸腰椎骨折/微创经皮/传统椎弓根螺钉内固定术

Key words

Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures/Minimally invasive percutaneous/Conventional pedicle screw internal fixation

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

王军,黄健,郭伟康..微创经皮和传统开放椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床效果比较[J].临床医学工程,2016,23(1):31-32,2.

基金项目

2014年度梅州市科技计划项目"经皮微创椎弓根钉内固定术在胸腰椎骨折中的应用"(项目编号:2014B09) (项目编号:2014B09)

临床医学工程

1674-4659

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文