摘要
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:To compare the anesthetic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride and propofol in pain-less colonoscopy. METHODS:80 patients who underwent painless colonoscopy was retrospectively analyzed and divided into group A and group B. Group A was given loading dose of 1 mg/kg propofol within 30 s and maintained with 6 mg/(kg·h);group B was given loading dose of 0.3 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection by micropump for slow pumping 5 min and maintained with 0.2-0.3 μg/(kg·h). Mean arterial pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR),oxygen saturation(SpO2)and respiratory rate(RR)be-fore examination (T0),before microscopic examination (T1),1 min (T2) and 10 min(T3) after microscopic examination,1 min (T4)and 5 min(T5)after colonoscopy withdrawal,onset time of anesthesia,entry time,examination time and discharge time,pa-tients with adjunctive use of fentanyl and incidence of adverse reactions in 2 groups were observed. RESULTS:MAP in group A at T1 was significantly lower than T0,HR in 2 groups at T1-T3 was significantly lower than T0,the differences were statistically signifi-cant(P<0.05),however,there were no significant differences in the SpO2 and RR between 2 groups(P>0.05). Onset time of an-esthesia,patients with adjunctive use of fentanyl and incidence of adverse reactions in group B were significantly lower than group B,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Both dexmedetomidine hydrochloride and propofol has good anesthetic effect in painless colonoscopy,but dexmedetomidine has better safety.关键词
盐酸右美托咪定/异丙酚/无痛结肠镜检查/麻醉效果/安全性Key words
Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride/Propofol/Painless colonoscopy/Anesthetic effect/Safety分类
医药卫生
