| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国动物检疫|两种O型口蹄疫ELISA检测试剂盒的对比

两种O型口蹄疫ELISA检测试剂盒的对比

吕晓丽 姚晓韵 何奇松 冯淑萍 马军 覃雨阳 李雪梅 熊毅 颜健华

中国动物检疫2016,Vol.33Issue(3):71-73,3.
中国动物检疫2016,Vol.33Issue(3):71-73,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-944X.2016.03.024

两种O型口蹄疫ELISA检测试剂盒的对比

Comparison of Two ELISA Kits for Detection of Type O FMDV Antibody

吕晓丽 1姚晓韵 1何奇松 2冯淑萍 2马军 1覃雨阳 1李雪梅 1熊毅 2颜健华2

作者信息

  • 1. 广西大学动物科学技术学院,广西南宁 530005
  • 2. 广西动物疫病预防控制中心,广西南宁 530001
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Aimed to compare which of the ELISA kits could detect antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus more easily,accurately and quickly,1 121 serums of swine,bovine and sheep immunized foot-and-mouth disease vaccine pro-vided by animal disease prevention and control center of various cities in Guangxi province were tested by LB-ELISA kits and SPC-ELISA kits. The sensitivity,specificity,antibody positive ratio and coincidence rate between the LB-ELI-SA kits and SPC-ELISA kits were compared. The results showed that the positive rates of two kinds of ELISA kits were different.The positive rate of LB-ELISA was 2.4% higher than that of SPC-ELISA.The requirment of antibody level of LB-ELISA kit was lower than that of SPC-ELISA kit.So the LB-ELISA kits were more suitable for detecting the foot-and-mouth disease virus infection.

关键词

O型口蹄疫/抗体/液相阻断酶联免疫吸附试验/固相竞争酶联免疫吸附试验/比较

Key words

serotype O FMDV/antibody/LB-ELISA/SPC-ELISA/comparison

分类

农业科技

引用本文复制引用

吕晓丽,姚晓韵,何奇松,冯淑萍,马军,覃雨阳,李雪梅,熊毅,颜健华..两种O型口蹄疫ELISA检测试剂盒的对比[J].中国动物检疫,2016,33(3):71-73,3.

基金项目

广西科技厅科技攻关项目 ()

中国动物检疫

1005-944X

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文