广东牙病防治2016，Vol.24Issue(4)：229-232,4.DOI:10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.04.007
无饰瓷氧化锆嵌体与金合金嵌体修复活髓磨牙Ⅱ类洞的疗效比较
Effect comparison of the zirconia inlay and gold alloy inlay in the restoration of the second class defect of molar with vital pulp
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effect of the zirconia inlay and gold alloy inlay in the restoration of the second class defect of molar with vital pulp. Methods 60 teeth were randomly divided into zirconia inlay group and gold alloy inlay group, with 30 teeth in each group. Evaluate the restoration effect in 2 group at 1-year follow-up. Results At 1-year follow-up, according to US Public Health Service Criteria, the success rate in anatomy zirconia group was 93. 53%, which was statistically higher than that of the gold alloy group ( P<0. 05) . In the comparison of aesthetics, the anatomy zirconia group was superior to that of the gold alloy group. Conclusion The aesthetic and overall success rate of the anatomy zirconia inlay is superior to that of the gold alloy inlay in the restoration of the second class defect of molar with vital pulp.关键词
氧化锆嵌体/金合金嵌体/磨牙/Ⅱ类洞缺损/临床研究Key words
Zirconia inlay/Gold alloy inlay/Molar/Second class defect/Clinical study分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
李东健,温兴涛,任柏林,钱三楼,戚娟娟..无饰瓷氧化锆嵌体与金合金嵌体修复活髓磨牙Ⅱ类洞的疗效比较[J].广东牙病防治,2016,24(4):229-232,4.基金项目
广东省医学科学技术研究基金( A2014606 ) （ A2014606 ）
广州市荔湾区科技局科技项目(20141216048) （20141216048）
