摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical therapeutic efficacy of the radial approach and the femoral ap-proach for coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease. Methods We selected 200 patients with coronary disease treated in our hospital,and divided them into two groups randomly according to different treatment methods,the radial artery group and the femoral artery group,100 cases in each group. Patients in each group were treated with puncture according to different arterial routes, and we compared the patients in the two groups in the end, according to the state during the operation, therapeutic efficacy and postoperative complications. Results The mean operation time. haspitalization time and complication rate had significantly difference between the two groups (P<0. 05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the catheterization success rate、number and length of stening、the amount of comtrast agent(P>0. 05). Conclution The interventional therapy via the radial artery and the femoral artery both have good therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of coronary heart disease, but the radial approach of inter-ventional therapy is better than femoral approach in the complication rate,hospitalization time and treatment and nursing cost of pa-tients,and worth being popularized.关键词
经股动脉/经桡动脉/介入治疗/冠心病/并发症Key words
via femoral artery/via radial artery/interventional therapy/coronary heart disease/complication分类
临床医学
