| 注册
首页|期刊导航|临床医学工程|新高压蒸汽灭菌器应用两种B-D测试法的监测效果对比

新高压蒸汽灭菌器应用两种B-D测试法的监测效果对比

张裕娴

临床医学工程2016,Vol.23Issue(3):272-273,2.
临床医学工程2016,Vol.23Issue(3):272-273,2.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2016.03.0272

新高压蒸汽灭菌器应用两种B-D测试法的监测效果对比

Comparison of Monitoring Results of Two Kinds of B-D Test Methods for New High-Pressure Steam Sterilizer

张裕娴1

作者信息

  • 1. 深圳市儿童医院,广东深圳518038
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the monitoring results of two kinds of B-D test methods for new high-pressure steam sterilizer. Methods During the test of pulsing forevacuum steam sterilizer, disposable B-D test wrap method and process challenge device method were used to carry out 98 pots of time of synchronization testing. The sensitivity to monitoring leak of sterilizer of two methods was compared. Results Disposable B-D test wrap method was not found any leak, while the process challenge device method was found 9 times of leak confirmed by sterilizer leak test. The sensitivity of the two methods showed statistical difference (P <0.05), and the sensitivity of process challenge device method was more significant than that of B-D test wrap method. Conclusions Effective and sensitive process challenge device method for new high-pressure steam sterilizer can be used to make up for the problem that disposable B-D test wrap cannot monitor the leak of pressure steam sterilizer, so as to ensure the accuracy of performance monitoring results of sterilizer.

关键词

一次性B-D测试包/过程挑战装置/高压蒸汽灭菌器/监测效果/对比/敏感度

Key words

Disposable B-D test wrap/Process challenge device/High-pressure steam sterilizer/Monitoring result/Comparison/Sensitivity

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

张裕娴..新高压蒸汽灭菌器应用两种B-D测试法的监测效果对比[J].临床医学工程,2016,23(3):272-273,2.

临床医学工程

1674-4659

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文