| 注册
首页|期刊导航|局解手术学杂志|扩张皮瓣法全耳再造术和改良Brent法全耳再造术的比较研究

扩张皮瓣法全耳再造术和改良Brent法全耳再造术的比较研究

吕巍 毋巨龙 王量 王凡 石海山 李世荣

局解手术学杂志2016,Vol.25Issue(3):188-190,3.
局解手术学杂志2016,Vol.25Issue(3):188-190,3.DOI:10.11659/jjssx.10E015152

扩张皮瓣法全耳再造术和改良Brent法全耳再造术的比较研究

Comparison of therapeutic effect between skin flap-extension auricular reconstruction and improved Brent au-ricular reconstruction

吕巍 1毋巨龙 1王量 1王凡 1石海山 1李世荣1

作者信息

  • 1. 第三军医大学西南医院整形美容外科,重庆400038
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the rate of postoperative complications and satisfaction between skin flap -extension auricular recon-struction ( hereinafter flap-extension ) and improved Brent auricular reconstruction ( hereinafter improved Brent ) .Methods From October 2009 to October 2014, totally 199 patients who have been diagnosed as congenital microtia and received auricular reconstruction were divided into two groups.Group A (159 patients) received flap-extension and Group B (40 patients) received improved Brent.The medical records, pre-and post-surgery photos of all patients were analyzed and satisfaction of patients was collected by the telephone follow -up.Results Pa-tients in both of the two groups were satisfied with their therapies .There were 47 cases of complications in Group A (29.6%, 47/159) and 5 cases of complications in Group B (12.5%, 5/40).The postoperative complications were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion There was no difference in patients ’ satisfaction between the two methods ,but the postoperative complications of improved Brent were much lower .

关键词

小耳畸形/全耳再造/并发症/扩张皮瓣/改良Brent

Key words

microtia/auricular reconstruction/complications/flap-extension/improved Brent

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

吕巍,毋巨龙,王量,王凡,石海山,李世荣..扩张皮瓣法全耳再造术和改良Brent法全耳再造术的比较研究[J].局解手术学杂志,2016,25(3):188-190,3.

基金项目

重庆市应用开发计划项目 ()

局解手术学杂志

OACSTPCD

1672-5042

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文